Decision in process after minor revision com After locking a submission, authors will be able to view their manuscripts in process but will not be able to edit them. The overall scientific quality of the paper. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Address reviewer comments clearly, seek clarification if needed, follow journal guidelines, resubmit promptly, and proofread thoroughly. 2020, that is after 2 years 3 months. Jul 26, 2018 · My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. Strangely, the new reviewers (who accepted the paper in its current form) seemed to be the same ones who initially asked for minor revisions. The journal gives a structure to our response, but does not detail what each decision specifically means. Peer-review policiesInitial submission Peer review Decision after review Revisions Final submission and acceptance Appeals and Complaints Initial submission Once submitted, your manuscript will be After a submission has been accepted or accepted with minor revisions as described above, editors can request additional revisions using the Request minor revisions command in the left-hand sidebar of the Submission Details page. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. The following decision types are available: Reject Major revision Minor revision Accept Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the The decision was received in Feb. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. The author is told that the manuscript has been reviewed very positively and the manuscript can be published if it is revised in response to the reviewers’ concerns. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. Aug 8, 2016 · Within a short period of time after submission, the status message showed ‘accept pending minor revisions. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for Sep 29, 2025 · Can authors access review reports as soon as they are received (even before a decision is made)? To save you time and effort, we only provide review reports after receiving all reports and making a decision. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. Sep 29, 2014 · Usually how long it takes to get final decision after submitting article after minor revision. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. As a peer reviewer, you chose ‘minor revisions’ if a Understanding the Decision Process What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Nov 5, 2012 · This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. Article explains definition of accept, minor revision, major revision, reject decisions in the peer review process After your article has been reviewed, you will receive an email with a first decision on the article. In previous revision cycles the editor acted very quickly and when submitted major revision the article went into review process within 2 days. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: ‘desk reject’, ‘revise and resubmit’, ‘major revisions’, ‘minor revisions’, or ‘paper accepted. Appeals - Authors may submit a formal appeal for rejected submissions. ’ Learn what these editorial decisions precisely mean, and how to react. Apr 18, 2025 · Minor revisions refine text, citations, and formatting. Provisional accept Following peer review, […] When to decide on ‘minor revisions’ As a manuscript author, receiving ‘minor revisions’ is a huge reason to celebrate. Jun 5, 2025 · Among these, revision decisions are crucial, with two primary types: major revision and minor revision. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. There’s always the possibility that a review report could be deemed unsuitable, or that the paper could be rejected. Sep 24, 2019 · On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. I'm extremely frustrated and confused. Since today I am able to see the "Decision in Process" update. How long does it take to give a decision after revision? Should I contact the editor to know about the update, if any? Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Congratulations. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Jan 18, 2020 · After two revisions, with minor comments in the second revision, my manuscript received an Editor Assigned status. It is very possible to get a minor revision as a first decision, and then major revision as second decision, and finally a rejection. I have submitted the article after minor revision but since 2 weeks the status is "with editor". Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. My last submission date after minor revision was Jan 17, where a minor revision comments from review was completed on Mar 17. See full list on grammarist. what it mean? I submitted a journal article a few months ago and, after going through 1 round of major revisions, I just got a decision that the paper requires minor revisions. Mar 15, 2016 · In this article, an experienced journal editor explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE evaluates the completed reviews and comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject it. During the revision stage, authors may submit revisions to their manuscripts unless the manuscript is locked for editing. The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. The author is provided with a set of instructions of how to resubmit the Apr 23, 2025 · I filed a formal complaint with the publisher, but was told the process followed internal policies, and that editors may reject a manuscript after minor revision if they’re not satisfied. It means that you are getting close to the final stages of the manuscript publication process! Thus, evaluating a manuscript of someone else and deciding on ‘minor revisions’ requires careful consideration. Decision Types Accept - No further revision required. Once published, editors can still submit and However, given that we are now 8 months down the line, I wouldn't expect the journal to change their mind on this - it is odd to send to new reviewers after a minor revision decision, but given that the work has been sent to new reviewers who raised issues, it would be odd to disregard those new reviewers. May 8, 2020 · To answer your question, as it has gone through two rounds of revision, that too with an Elsevier journal, it is likely to be accepted. Contents The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. However, it may not be prudent to begin celebrating just yet, because for those same reasons, it may perhaps not get accepted. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Can we expect that after this minor revision the editor is Feb 28, 2019 · Minor revisions explained An editorial decision of ‘minor revisions’ on your paper means that your work will almost certainly not be going back to the original peer reviewers for a further round of comments; indeed this is policy for many journals. Mar 12, 2021 · Typically, there are five main decisions that are made as a result of the peer review process. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. Since then it has been 2 months, but yet to receive the decision. IOP has a range of different decisions you could receive and these are outlined below. Revisions - Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript. There’s only 1 comment, and I’ll probably submit the revision tomorrow- it won’t have to undergo peer review again, so I expect it will be accepted by next week. What does it mean, and how long should I wait for the final decision? Apr 14, 2024 · Article explains definition of accept, minor revision, major revision, reject decisions in the peer review process I was invited to review a journal paper for the first time but have some slight confusion on what should lead to a major/minor revision decision. This can be heart-breaking to authors. I sent the revised version, and the editor said he would let us know the decision after referee's recommendation. Examples: Some re-writing is needed Jun 17, 2023 · I received a major revision of one of my articles. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. So, a review of your paper will generally indicate that you need to Nov 21, 2022 · Status of paper changed from "Awaiting recommendation" to "Peer review in Process", after Major revision and minor revision completed. Understanding the difference between these two outcomes is essential for researchers navigating the journal submission process. . The Academic Editor can make a decision from among the following options: accept in its current form, accept with minor revision, reject and decline resubmission, reject but encourage resubmission, ask the author for a revision, or ask for an additional reviewer. Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Sep 3, 2025 · Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. ’ The only comment I received was: "Please check your paper for English language editing, and ensure that you follow the Editorial Formatting Comments listed in this letter. These are: Rejection Rejection with option to resubmit Accepted pending major revisions Accepted pending minor revisions Accepted in current form A publication accepting an article in its current form with no revisions is very rare. What's the difference between a minor and major revision? Response: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. " My paper had been edited by Editage before submission and I plan to get it edited once again How many revisions should be allowed? We would normally allow authors to make only two rounds of revision to avoid a lengthy peer-review process, which can become frustrating for authors and reviewers alike. Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. You will see what each decision type is and what it means for you and your article. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). If further small revisions need to be made or a manuscript needs copy-editing, we can offer a third revision period. Editors can revise locked unpublished manuscripts. 751v uv g35c gqoc st6bty rp3 cnswwea shxgtxal snnwgw rh3